 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Cities in New Hampshire with Drug Rehab and Treatment Centers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
866-407-4380
|
Drug Rehab New Hampshire
is here to help people with drug and/or alcohol abuse problems in New Hampshire. find treatment options. Due to our diverse networking system we can find a treatment option tailored to each individuals specific situation and needs. We are able to provide all phases of recovery included but not limited to, alcohol and/or drug intervention, drug and/or alcohol detox, in-patient treatment, out-patient treatment, short term treatment (30 days or less), long term treatment (90 days or longer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We design personalized treatment programs to provide each abuser with the greatest chance of a successful recovery outcome. Our comprehensive networking system works hand in hand with all of the drug treatment centers in New Hampshire. At Drug Rehab New Hampshire we know that each individual is unique and are treated as such. Deciding upon a treatment option in New Hampshire, or anywhere can be a daunting task for any individual or family, we will guide you through each step of a comprehensive treatment plan for you or your loved one. We are determined in our mission, that every drug and/or alcohol abuser in New Hampshire. that has a desire to change their life will be given a chance to recover from their addiction and we are dedicated to ensuring that they are given the opportunity to do so.
|
|
We realize that each individual in New Hampshire. is in a different financial situation and we will find treatment options for each individual regardless of their financial situation. No matter what your financial situation everyone will receive the treatment help they are looking for.
|
|
|
|
866-407-4380
|
|
New Hampshire near last for anti-smoking fundsNew Hampshire ranks at the bottom in spending on tobacco prevention, according to a report released yesterday by a coalition of health organizations.
The report looked at how the 50 states were spending their share of a multi-billion-dollar settlement in 1998 between the states and the tobacco industry. This year, New Hampshire has a share of the money was around $46 million. In recent years, state legislators have set aside $3 million a year of that money for anti-smoking programs. But in this year's budget, all of the New Hampshire settlement money has been allocated elsewhere.
New Hampshire state health advocates lamented that decision yesterday and urged politicians to increase spending on tobacco education programs.
"What we've seen over the last five years is a strong erosion of state commitment to tobacco prevention programs," said Debbie Horner, executive director of the Smoke-Free New Hampshire Alliance.
The money from the so-called master settlement agreement has been a point of contention almost from the moment the deal was signed. The settlement amounted to $246 billion over 25 years, to be divided proportionally among the 50 states. Anti-smoking advocates have pushed for prevention programs, medical research and health care, while state governments have often spent their share to close budget gaps. The settlement also imposed some restrictions on how tobacco products are marketed.
Yesterday's report offered a bleak assessment for the nation as a whole: Only four states fund their tobacco prevention programs at the minimum level recommended by the Centers for Disease Control. And in the past two years, states have cut their total spending on anti-smoking programs by 28 percent, or $209 million.
New Hampshire was one of five states to spend none of its settlement money this year on anti-tobacco programs. The other states were Michigan, Missouri, South Carolina and Tennessee.
Horner said New Hampshire lawmakers violated the original intent of the settlement by not devoting at least a portion of the money to combat tobacco use. She cited cigarette manufacturers' increased advertising budgets ($50 million a year in New Hampshire) as another reason for the state to spend its settlement money this way.
"Questions need to be posed to both the governor and the Legislature about why these funds are not being spent in the way they were intended to be spent," she said.
Maine ranked first in the nation in its tobacco prevention spending, the report determined, spending $14.5 million on such programs. Five years ago, Maine's youth smoking rate was among the highest in the country. Since 1998, the number of Maine high school students who smoke has fallen 48 percent - a direct result of government spending on prevention programs, said Lori Fresina, New England representative for the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.
New Hampshire had some of the highest levels of smoking, especially among groups such as pregnant women and high school students. Nearly one in four New Hampshire high school students smoke. The state has the lowest tax on tobacco products in New England. The report found that New Hampshire spends none of the approximately $95 million in tobacco tax revenue it collects each year on prevention programs.
"The good news for New Hampshire is that it doesn't have to be this way," Fresina said.
The cut in tobacco prevention funding this year has already affected several local groups. Pam DiNapoli, of the Concord Substance Abuse Coalition, said her organization has relied more on volunteers and donations since losing state funding earlier this year. The coalition had set up several anti-smoking programs in schools, but some of these risk being cut, she said.
"It's hard to keep people organized and keep them passionate when the state government doesn't seem to be behind it," DiNapoli said.
Drug Rehab by County
|
|
More...